Problem

Records received via replication were not being evicted by the cleanup scanner even when they carried an expiresAt value. Three issues:

1. expiresAt missing from options passed to _writeUpdate

In a multi-record transaction batch, every event after the first is processed with txnInProgress (the first event) as context. Subsequent events had no expiresAt in their options, so _writeUpdate saw context.expiresAt from the first record applied to all records — or saw nothing if the first record had no expiration.

2. _writeUpdate didn't read expiresAt from options

// before
const expiresAt: number = context?.expiresAt ?? (expirationMs ? expirationMs + Date.now() : -1);

// after
const expiresAt: number = options?.expiresAt ?? context?.expiresAt ?? (expirationMs ? expirationMs + Date.now() : -1);

3. scheduleCleanup() not armed for replicated writes

// before — only fired when context carried expiresAt (local writes)
if (context.expiresAt) scheduleCleanup();

// after — fires whenever the computed expiresAt is valid
if (expiresAt >= 0) scheduleCleanup();

Relationship to v4 cross-version replication

When receiving a table copy from a v4 peer, auditRecord.expiresAt may be undefined due to a separate encoding bug in v4's table copy path (see harperdb/harperdb#3120). The fallback expirationMs + Date.now() in point 2 above handles this case: if the v5 table is pre-configured with an expiration value before connecting to the v4 cluster, the receiver computes a fresh expiresAt at receipt time.

Test plan

Integration test replicationTopology.test.mjs covers both cases:

• v5→v5: multi-record batch TTL eviction across all nodes
• v4→v5: cross-version TTL eviction (requires harper-pro change, see below)

Signed-off by Claude